🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours prior to the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – not just the winner overall, and block by block. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while failed to predict the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. He has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

How was your night?

I had to do that because they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the system every few minutes! I felt a little nervous initially: Mamdani led the early vote by 12 points, but came large groups of ballots that came in later and his lead went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world in which election day turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, where the opponent would have basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But the winner added 500,000 votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his support from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the alliance that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump last year backed the progressive now. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought it could exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial opposition group, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to get over half. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still around 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. Thus it’s not it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it so then none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly surprised me. The independent held very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these conservatives on the island who had a high participation. I believe occurred a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened prior to the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the Greek landlords and residents supported the independent. Thus there was some opposition. But no, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he did well. However in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. Plus, you have Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, who were strongly supportive. So I don’t know if there were major surprises here, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city represents in politics? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key figures from progressives come from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that each urban center in America could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of progressive influence in America – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.