🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.